<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More questions on SAT Writing section validity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collegeadmissionspartners.com/college-testing/more-questions-on-sat-writing-section-validity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collegeadmissionspartners.com/college-testing/more-questions-on-sat-writing-section-validity/?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>Trying to find the right college for you? Don't have adequate college admissions counseling available at your school? Looking for news (and some ramblings) about the whole college search process? You have come to the right place.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SAT writing section better predictor of college grades than old SAT : College Admissions Counseling</title>
		<link>http://www.collegeadmissionspartners.com/college-testing/more-questions-on-sat-writing-section-validity/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>SAT writing section better predictor of college grades than old SAT : College Admissions Counseling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 20:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collegeadmissionspartners.com/blog/more-questions-on-sat-writing-section-validity/#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>[...] Board changed the SAT in 2005 to add a writing section to the required test. There have been many criticisms of the new writing test since that time and many colleges either don&#8217;t consider it or give it limited consideration. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Board changed the SAT in 2005 to add a writing section to the required test. There have been many criticisms of the new writing test since that time and many colleges either don&#8217;t consider it or give it limited consideration. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
